A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Parks staff detail gopher-control program, maintenance shortfalls and a multi‑year wish list

June 26, 2026 | Templeton, San Luis Obispo County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Parks staff detail gopher-control program, maintenance shortfalls and a multi‑year wish list
Parks maintenance staff updated the committee on field maintenance, ongoing gopher control efforts and a prioritized Parks & Recreation wish list.

Staff described a multi-pronged integrated pest management approach that includes CritterMax applied via an EasyFlow irrigation adapter, mechanical "Gopher Hawk" devices placed in runs, and a carbon-monoxide smoke tool for certain runs. Parks staff stopped using a pellet bait product and emphasized nonchemical mitigation where possible because of park users, including dogs.

Staff noted a staffing gap last winter when the district lacked a second parks maintenance worker; rehiring (Eric Jackson joined the crew) has restored daily trap-setting capacity and increased the pace of mitigation. Staff track capture tallies and use flags and on-site monitoring to keep traps and devices out of public play areas.

The committee also reviewed a parks wish list with items that range from modest ($5,000 for a replacement golf cart, $5,000 gopher smoker) to major capital projects: bleacher ADA upgrades (site access cost estimates vary widely), lighting projects (tens of thousands), and a full turf/irrigation replacement and leveling project estimated in planning documents at roughly $750,000–$1,000,000.

Staff said some funding options exist—development impact fees can be used to expand services, and private grants have funded items such as a recently ordered turf renovation machine—but Templeton’s median-income metrics limit eligibility for some state grants that prioritize disadvantaged communities. Staff also noted county-level CDBG funding would require the county to prioritize subrecipients.

The committee asked staff to continue tracking costs, tallying gopher-control outcomes, and refining capital estimates for the upcoming budget cycle.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee