A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Teacher urges board to limit online credit-recovery programs, says they "do not contribute to student learning"

June 27, 2026 | Birmingham Community Charter High District, School Districts, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Teacher urges board to limit online credit-recovery programs, says they "do not contribute to student learning"
Chris McCormack, a social science teacher, told the Birmingham Community Charter High District board during public comment that online credit-recovery programs used by the district "do not contribute to student learning." He said such programs often produce inflated grades and help students pass requirements without giving them the skills needed outside the classroom.

"Overall, the evidence and the report studies show that these programs do not contribute to student learning," McCormack said, and described a petition he circulated that he said was signed by more than 70 teachers asking the school to set parameters around those programs. He said some vendors allow a student to complete a failed course in a week with little oversight and that the practice undermines incentives for students to reach their potential.

McCormack offered alternatives, including expanding the district's CBIS program, which he described as having "a lot of teacher oversight, teachers in the room with students, watching them." He also said other districts have adopted policies that discourage or limit vendor-run credit recovery and that he could provide the board with model policies and evidence supporting his claims.

A board member asked whether McCormack had brought his concerns to the curriculum-and-instruction committee; McCormack said he had discussed the issue with Mr. Ali and Principal Bennett but had not taken it to that committee. Board members suggested that curriculum and instruction would be the appropriate next step if the board were to consider policy changes.

McCormack told the board he would be willing to provide his evidence and policy examples to staff and board members for further consideration. The public-comment portion closed without formal action; board members advised following the district's internal policy-review channels.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee