Stephen Elliot, director of watershed programs at the (transcript) Finals Alliance, told the Pinelands Commission’s Policy & Implementation Committee on June 26 that work at Peton Lake has produced a roughly 0.7-mile accessible loop with stabilized surfacing, two boardwalks and improved trailheads.
Elliot said the project—rebranded under the Nature Accessible for All program—used low-cost, inert materials (clean stone aggregate, landscape fabric and compacted stone dust) to level and stabilize the trail and avoid damaging tree roots. ‘‘The trail itself starts here at the Magnolia Well … it goes about .7 miles around Peton Lake,’’ he said, and noted partners included township public works and grants from Inclusive Healthy Communities and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation.
The project team added two boardwalks to span low-lying saturated sections and installed two handicap parking spaces at the Coleman's Bridge Road trailhead; presenters said the boardwalks are about four feet wide. As an environmental offset, the team installed a roughly 350-square-foot rain garden planted with about 80 native species and placed interpretive signage. Contractors also removed legacy impervious surfaces, including a large concrete slab near Magnolia Road, and planted saplings (96 smaller pines were ordered for fall planting where larger stock was unavailable).
‘‘We used minimal materials—clean stone aggregate and landscape fabric—so we can build on top of root systems rather than cut through them,’’ Elliot said, describing the approach and the maintenance plan. He estimated spot refurbishing every two to five years depending on use and said volunteers will support future planting and upkeep.
Carlton Montgomery of the (transcript) Plans Alliance praised the result but sharply criticized the regulatory path the project followed. ‘‘The commission's approach … violates the CMP. A premise that was never proven,’’ he said, arguing that the time-consuming, consultant-driven process for wetland and buffer deviations discourages municipalities and nonprofits from pursuing accessibility improvements. Montgomery called for faster, clearer rule changes so similar projects are not ‘‘trapped in a model’’ that is ‘‘not rational’’ and is ‘‘causing harm’’ by blocking feasible projects.
The committee chair responded that the Commission must protect the Pinelands and cannot change rules hastily. ‘‘We are charged with protecting the Pinelands … we can’t alter our rules because it’s well-intentioned,’’ the chair said, while acknowledging staff is working on amendments that might ease permitting for some accessible trails outside wetlands and buffers.
Commissioners pressed staff on monitoring, outreach and usage data. Elliot said the Nature Accessible for All initiative includes outreach and mapping to connect disabled users with accessible sites; organizers have run at least three accessible birding programs at the site and occasional counts by friends groups provide small-sample usage data. Presenters said chicanes and gates have reduced motorcycle intrusion and that only minor trail damage (small dug holes) has been observed recently.
Staff and commissioners discussed two procedural paths for future projects: (1) continue using MOAs and case-by-case review when trails touch wetlands and wetland buffers, as was done at Peton Lake; or (2) complete rule amendments now under discussion that would permit certain accessible trail surfacing outside wetlands, reducing the need for MOAs but not authorizing surfacing within wetlands or certain buffered areas without special review.
No formal action on the Peton Lake trail itself was taken by the committee; staff said they will continue work on possible CMP amendments to clarify when accessible trails can be permitted without MOAs and will return with more detailed recommendations at a future meeting.