Chairman Kelly raised an article and excerpts from a recent U.S. Senate hearing alleging a link between COVID‑19 mRNA vaccines and increased cancer risk and asked whether the Board of Health should be concerned.
Kelly read several claims into the record and asked, “Should this board be concerned with that?” She framed the questions as a request for awareness and discussion rather than asking for immediate policy action.
A member who identified themselves as a commissioner responded that scientific conclusions in some cases later proved to be wrong and cautioned that the board could not resolve broad national scientific debates in the meeting. “Well, we know that some of that science proved to be wrong and dangerous,” the commissioner said, according to the meeting transcript.
Other board members and participants said the principal issue was mandates rather than the vaccines themselves and that elected officials — not the board — generally decide enforcement of public‑health orders and mandates. One board member said the practical response was vigilance: “I think the best thing we can do is just pay attention, be aware,” and recommended referring structural or enforcement questions to county commissioners and municipal leaders.
The discussion mixed policy concerns, personal testimony and questions about how to distinguish reliable science from misinformation. The board did not take formal action on the matter during the meeting; the item was recorded as a public comment and board discussion.
An online public commenter also urged officials not to use force and to trust people to make their own health decisions; the board accepted the public comment and moved on to adjournment.
The board did not endorse the claim linking vaccines to cancer; meeting participants characterized the claims as contested and noted the board’s limited local enforcement authority.