Bear County 187th District Court docket: pleas accepted, deferred adjudications entered and a probation-revocation hearing set

The 187th District Court in Bear County on Wednesday addressed multiple criminal dockets, resolving pleas and deferred-adjudication requests and setting a contested hearing on a probation-revocation motion.

The court accepted a plea and the state’s recommendation for deferred adjudication in State v. Jada Code (2026 CR01268). The judge informed the defendant of rights and consequences — including immigration consequences — and the record reflects the plea includes a $1,000 fine (probated), four years’ community supervision, 100 hours of community service, restitution, parenting classes, TAP evaluation and monthly field visits as recommended by the state.

In State v. Cynthia Dino (2025 CR0001146), the court announced two years’ deferred adjudication for each count. In a related docket (listed with variations in the transcript as Diano/Denno), the court proceeded on a motion to revoke deferred adjudication and the defendant pleaded ‘not true’ to several alleged violations: consuming alcohol in April 2026, failing to report in April 2026, operating a motor vehicle without a valid Texas license on May dates in 2026, and failing to maintain an required ignition interlock device. The court set a contested hearing for July 9 to allow the state to present evidence on the allegations.

The court also took a plea for Brendan Hudson (2024 CR012780), in which the state proceeded on a lesser‑included offense (attempted offense) that is a state‑jail felony; the plea documents reflect punishment assessed at 18 months in the state jail and other plea conditions. In court the judge noted the plea and attached custody/credit documentation showing out‑of‑state incarceration that will be considered for credit.

Other administrative matters included scheduling resets where defense counsel requested additional time to secure discovery or locate evidence, and bench inquiries about outstanding warrants that could affect custody status. Several items were continued or reset to July calendar dates to allow counsel and personnel time to coordinate discovery, notice and availability.

The calendar reflected a mix of resolved pleas and pending contested matters: courts routinely accepted plea agreements with the admonishments required by law and set contested hearings where factual disputes remained. The docket items that were decided will generate formal minute orders and written judgments to be entered by the clerk.

The judge repeatedly instructed parties to coordinate with the clerk (Norma) for scheduling and reminded defendants and counsel of procedural rights and obligations.