Rep. Lee presses CRS on AI; CRS official highlights data tools, urges offices to consult CRS
June 25, 2026 | House Administration: House Committee, Standing Committees - House & Senate, Congressional Hearings Compilation, Legislative, Federal
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
Representative J. Lee questioned Dr. Donfried of the Congressional Research Service on the agency’s current and prospective uses of artificial intelligence during a House Administration committee exchange.
Lee opened by thanking Dr. Donfried and stressing CRS’s role as a nonpartisan source that must keep pace with technology while maintaining accuracy and rigor. Lee said earlier discussion had flagged “the unsatisfactory response of the … large language models in creating those bill summaries” and asked Dr. Donfried for specific examples where CRS has used AI or advanced data tools successfully to help congressional offices.
Dr. Donfried replied that CRS has applied AI to coding tasks that speed production of interactive graphics and infographics, which allows visualization experts to focus on analytic judgment. “AI is very good in speeding up that process and freeing up our visualization and graphics experts to do the work that AI can’t,” he said.
He described broader data-analytics work CRS began after congressional direction in 2023. “To date, my colleagues have created at this point five different data analytic models that we’re using from everything from health insurance pricing to a student loan calculator,” Dr. Donfried said, and he noted a tool that ingests public comments from Regulations.gov and uses AI-assisted analysis to synthesize sentiment (positive, neutral, negative) and verify results to help policymakers understand comment trends.
Rep. Lee then asked whether CRS had use cases that would help offices respond to constituent questions in real time — for example on disaster assistance or federal benefits. Dr. Donfried emphasized CRS’s role in constituent support and urged Members and staff to “go to CRS first.” He added he was “not confident in the accuracy of AI models to produce analysis for you,” and said CRS would continue to serve legislative, oversight and representational needs.
The exchange focused on practical CRS tools — graphics automation, discrete analytic models and a comment-synthesis tool — and on the agency’s caution about relying on AI for substantive analysis. No formal vote or committee action was recorded in this portion of the hearing.
Lee opened by thanking Dr. Donfried and stressing CRS’s role as a nonpartisan source that must keep pace with technology while maintaining accuracy and rigor. Lee said earlier discussion had flagged “the unsatisfactory response of the … large language models in creating those bill summaries” and asked Dr. Donfried for specific examples where CRS has used AI or advanced data tools successfully to help congressional offices.
Dr. Donfried replied that CRS has applied AI to coding tasks that speed production of interactive graphics and infographics, which allows visualization experts to focus on analytic judgment. “AI is very good in speeding up that process and freeing up our visualization and graphics experts to do the work that AI can’t,” he said.
He described broader data-analytics work CRS began after congressional direction in 2023. “To date, my colleagues have created at this point five different data analytic models that we’re using from everything from health insurance pricing to a student loan calculator,” Dr. Donfried said, and he noted a tool that ingests public comments from Regulations.gov and uses AI-assisted analysis to synthesize sentiment (positive, neutral, negative) and verify results to help policymakers understand comment trends.
Rep. Lee then asked whether CRS had use cases that would help offices respond to constituent questions in real time — for example on disaster assistance or federal benefits. Dr. Donfried emphasized CRS’s role in constituent support and urged Members and staff to “go to CRS first.” He added he was “not confident in the accuracy of AI models to produce analysis for you,” and said CRS would continue to serve legislative, oversight and representational needs.
The exchange focused on practical CRS tools — graphics automation, discrete analytic models and a comment-synthesis tool — and on the agency’s caution about relying on AI for substantive analysis. No formal vote or committee action was recorded in this portion of the hearing.
Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!
Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.
✓
Get instant access to full meeting videos
✓
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
✓
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
✓
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
30-day money-back guarantee
