Ojai City Council directs 360-degree performance review of city manager
June 23, 2026 | Ojai City, Ventura County, California
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The Ojai City Council on June 23 directed staff to carry out a 360-degree performance evaluation of the city manager, the council reported after adjourning to closed session.
The special meeting began with a roll call confirming the presence of Mayor Gilman, Mayor pro tem Mayne, Council member Rule, Council member Lane and Council member Whitman. The council recited the Pledge of Allegiance and then reviewed its closed-session agenda. Staff reported there were no attendees on the Zoom line and no raised hands for public comment before the body adjourned to closed session.
After the closed session, a staff member reported that “the city council directed that the city conduct a 360 performance evaluation of the city manager for his performance evaluation.” The report also noted that a second closed session produced no reportable action. The transcript does not specify a timeline for the evaluation or further procedural steps.
No motion text, vote tallies or names of a mover and seconder were recorded in the public report of the closed session direction. The meeting concluded after the closed session report.
The special meeting began with a roll call confirming the presence of Mayor Gilman, Mayor pro tem Mayne, Council member Rule, Council member Lane and Council member Whitman. The council recited the Pledge of Allegiance and then reviewed its closed-session agenda. Staff reported there were no attendees on the Zoom line and no raised hands for public comment before the body adjourned to closed session.
After the closed session, a staff member reported that “the city council directed that the city conduct a 360 performance evaluation of the city manager for his performance evaluation.” The report also noted that a second closed session produced no reportable action. The transcript does not specify a timeline for the evaluation or further procedural steps.
No motion text, vote tallies or names of a mover and seconder were recorded in the public report of the closed session direction. The meeting concluded after the closed session report.
Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!
Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.
✓
Get instant access to full meeting videos
✓
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
✓
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
✓
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
30-day money-back guarantee
