A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Downtown redevelopment and Scientology’s role draw sharp divisions in Clearwater debate

June 23, 2026 | Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Downtown redevelopment and Scientology’s role draw sharp divisions in Clearwater debate
The Cleveland Street redevelopment and the presence of Scientology in downtown Clearwater became one of the debate’s most contentious topics, with candidates offering sharply different diagnoses and prescriptions.

Mark Bunker framed the issue as a central motivation for his candidacy, saying he ran previously ‘‘largely on Scientology’’ and warned the council risked being controlled by the organization. He said local developers and named figures have pushed projects without adequate city engagement and told the audience he had previously felt shut out of certain downtown planning conversations.

Other candidates stopped short of accusing the organization of control but called for more openness. Bianca Lvala said the relationship ‘‘is not healthy’’ and urged two-way communication and compromise; she called for city officials to reduce tensions and ensure non-elected actors do not unduly shape planning outcomes.

Jared Leone and Sam Wilson emphasized collaborative activation of downtown—working with residents, property owners, nonprofits and developers to create a walkable, vibrant core that serves residents and visitors. Kevin RT Lachland and others pressed for clearer public presentations about developers’ plans and repeated concerns that city leaders were not getting straightforward answers when projects were discussed.

Candidates repeatedly returned to transparency and public process: several said referendums or public meetings should be available for major uses of public streets or property, while others warned that automatic referendums on every sale would chill development.

None of the candidates offered a binding policy change voted on in the forum; instead they described competing approaches—leverage public meetings and referendums in some cases, emphasize negotiated partnerships and activation in others. The debate underscored that how the city governs downtown redevelopment will be an early test for the next council.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee