A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Redwood Valley residents urge collaborative approach to AB 518 (hip camps), citing fire, traffic and enforcement concerns

June 18, 2026 | Mendocino County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Redwood Valley residents urge collaborative approach to AB 518 (hip camps), citing fire, traffic and enforcement concerns
Three public commenters representing Redwood Valley urged the planning commission to increase local outreach and tailor any ordinance implementing Assembly Bill 518 — sometimes called the Low Impact Camping Areas Act or "hip camps" — to avoid unintended local impacts.

"Our community seeks to maintain a peaceful quality of life," Christine Boyd said, noting the Redwood Valley Municipal Advisory Council had not been included in staff outreach and asking that staff collaborate with residents before finalizing any ordinance. Boyd enumerated specific concerns: increased fire hazards, enforcement burdens and trespass risks on private easements.

Patricia Risso, a municipal advisory council member who spoke as a private citizen, told commissioners commercial cannabis development in recent years had already produced traffic, noise and environmental stresses, and warned broad allowance of hip camps by simple parcel zoning could repeat those impacts. She advocated limiting agri‑tourism to well‑infrastructure event sites such as wineries and keeping high‑impact uses confined to appropriate sites.

Redwood Valley resident Francis Owen urged strict local application of AB 518 provisions if the county moves to align with the state. Owen recommended the county conduct compliance reviews of existing hip camps, consider minimal or strategically placed permits with appropriate infrastructure, and have proposed permits reviewed by the Redwood Valley MAC.

Commissioners acknowledged the comments and noted staff will incorporate public input as the county develops any local ordinance and as the Local Coastal Program update and other planning work proceed. The commission did not take action on AB 518 implementation at this meeting.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee