A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Board backs new Justice Services & Support Department with community co-creation; probation to report on record-clearance and staffing ratios

June 16, 2026 | Santa Clara County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board backs new Justice Services & Support Department with community co-creation; probation to report on record-clearance and staffing ratios
The Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors voted to receive the report on a proposed Justice Services & Support Department (JSSD) and directed administration to co-create the department’s mission, priorities and program designs with community stakeholders through a formal public engagement process.

Why it matters: Supervisors voiced concern about how the new department would relate to existing violence prevention, public-health and reentry efforts and emphasized that community engagement and integration with ongoing initiatives must guide design decisions.

What was said: Supervisor Ellenburg and others urged transparent, strategic co-design and asked that existing efforts — such as the county’s violence-prevention initiative and school-county collaborative programs — be braided into the new structure rather than siloed. A motion to receive the report and require a co-creation process carried unanimously.

Probation and record clearance: The Board then considered Items 52 and 53 related to the Probation Department. Supervisors questioned reductions to record-clearance and expungement services the department previously provided to the public. Probation leaders said two full-time staff historically supported record-clearance work and that pop-up community events and partnerships with law clinics would continue, but several contracts were eliminated to meet a $1.6 million contract reduction within a broader departmental deficit.

Supervisors asked probation to provide off-agenda reports with: (1) an estimate of how many people not on probation would be affected by the change in expungement services and (2) supervisor/manager-to-line-staff ratios over the past three years so the Board can evaluate staffing levels and impacts. Probation agreed to return with those numbers and to update website materials with next-step guidance for residents seeking record clearance.

Outcome: The Board approved the JSSD-related motion and the probation items and directed multiple follow-ups, including staffing-ratio reporting and service-impact estimates.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee