During public comment on June 8, Michelle First, a Princeton resident, strongly criticized the municipal process for a recent Spruce Street zoning change tied to the fourth round of affordable‑housing planning. First said the town “dramatically changed the zoning property next door without noticing us” and argued that the resulting, more permissive zoning could put a 45‑foot building 10 feet from her property line and shade her backyard much of the day.
First emphasized she supports inclusionary and affordable housing but said the process must be transparent and accessible so neighbors can participate. She told council the lack of clear notice removes residents’ agency, risks misinformation, and can leave litigation as the only recourse if the community is excluded.
Council did not address the zoning matter in detail during the meeting. Mayor and staff told commenters that the scope of the policy topic would require a longer discussion and offered to follow up: the mayor invited First and student groups to submit questions by email and to be connected with elected officials or staff for briefings.
Students presenting under the name Princeton Policy Review — including Vivon and Myra Chry — asked whether Princeton has a specific numeric state obligation for affordable units under its fourth‑round requirements and how the municipality plans to meet those obligations. Council responded that the topic deserves a longer conversation and encouraged the students to send their questions so staff or council can arrange follow‑up.
Other speakers voiced support for stronger community engagement as Princeton implements more housing projects and asked for clearer, more inclusive processes to reduce conflict and build trust.
What’s next: council invited commenters to follow up by email so staff or elected officials can provide more detailed information; no formal action or vote on the Spruce Street zoning change occurred during the June 8 meeting.