A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

LaSalle County board adopts resolution opposing any reallocation of enhanced‑911 search‑charge funds away from per‑capita basis

June 08, 2026 | LaSalle County, Illinois


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

LaSalle County board adopts resolution opposing any reallocation of enhanced‑911 search‑charge funds away from per‑capita basis
LaSalle County Board members on June 8 adopted an amended resolution opposing any reallocation of enhanced‑911 search‑charge funds by the LaSalle County Joint Emergency Telephone Services Board (JetsB) away from a per‑capita allocation.

Brent Bader, director of community development and deputy clerk for the City of LaSalle, read a statement on behalf of representatives from Peru, LaSalle and Oglesby, asking the county to postpone action because the municipalities received the proposed resolution only hours before the meeting and wanted more time to discuss possible impacts. Bader said a per‑capita distribution may not reflect actual call volume and expressed concern that a reallocation could effectively subsidize services for one community at the expense of others.

County staff and several board members said the resolution is preemptive and intended to protect the county’s historical reliance on per‑capita distribution under the intergovernmental agreement ratified in 2016. County dispatch currently receives roughly 42.93% of search‑charge funds under the per‑capita formula; other dispatch centers receive smaller shares. Diane Styles, the county 911 director, told the board LaSalle County dispatch handles more than 150,000 calls when administrative and 911 calls are combined.

Some members argued the resolution was late in arriving to the packet and asked whether the JetsB had formally scheduled a vote; staff said the JetsB may discuss the item at its June 16 meeting. A motion to table the resolution was defeated (4 yes, 22 no). The board then adopted an amendment clarifying opposition to "any manner other than per capita" and passed the amended resolution.

Supporters said the measure preserves the intent of the voters who approved the search charge and protects county dispatch funding; opponents argued the board and affected municipalities should have more time and information before action.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee