A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Kent County panel approves adding six assistant prosecutors under state grant, flags sustainability questions

June 10, 2026 | Kent County, Michigan


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Kent County panel approves adding six assistant prosecutors under state grant, flags sustainability questions
The Kent County Board of Commissioners Policy and Operations Committee voted to approve a request to add six assistant prosecuting attorney full-time equivalents supported by a Michigan Department of Treasury local prosecutor support grant and referred the item to the full Board of Commissioners for final approval.

Administrator Al told the committee the county ‘‘has been working hard for years’’ to secure the state funding, that contractual language delays in the House bill slowed distribution, and that the prosecutor’s office advertised early and identified six strong attorney candidates. ‘‘We should have a contract in hand any day now,’’ Al said, adding that hires will not begin until the county has a signed reimbursement agreement with the state.

A commissioner identified that the original grant application included three additional non-attorney roles—two advocates and one investigator—that are not part of the current resolution. The Minority Vice Chair asked why the resolution approves six attorney FTEs rather than nine total positions. Administrator Al said the prosecutor plans a phased approach: attorneys would be hired first, and the county will return with a separate action request in a subsequent fiscal-year phase for the remaining three positions once pay and benefit costs are clarified.

Several commissioners warned the committee the grant funds are reimbursement-based and that the award appears to be a limited stream, raising the prospect that newly hired positions could create future general-fund obligations. One commissioner asked whether the additions move the prosecutor’s office toward ‘‘parity’’ with public defenders; Al and others said measuring parity is ambiguous and that the various funding streams are not necessarily linked.

The committee motion was made by Commissioner Ste, supported by Commissioner Dbor, and approved in committee; the record notes the item will go before the full board on Thursday. The transcript does not include vote tallies.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee