A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Lewistown commission votes to appeal variances granted to Springwater Apartments

June 06, 2026 | City of Lewistown, Fergus County, Montana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Lewistown commission votes to appeal variances granted to Springwater Apartments
After reopening the meeting following an executive session, a staff member reminded commissioners that "what was discussed in close session in executive session was confidential" and instructed them not to discuss the matter with the public, by email, social media, letters or personal communications, and to refer any public questions to Holly.

On Item 2, commissioners discussed a pending appeal related to variances that the Lewistown Board of Adjustment granted to Springwater Apartments. Commissioner Robertson moved "to engage [outside counsel] Felt Martin PC to file an appeal from the district court on behalf of the city commission challenging [the granting of variances]," and Commissioner Warren seconded the motion.

The commission proceeded to a roll-call vote. Commissioners Bowser, Bueller, Day, Hewitt, Robertson, Shaver and Warren each responded during roll call; the transcript records these responses as affirmative during the roll call. The transcript does not record any 'no' votes or an abstention during the roll call, and no vote counts beyond those named responses are specified.

The motion directs the commission to retain outside counsel to initiate litigation challenging the variances; the transcript does not specify the legal grounds for the appeal, a filing timeline, or the exact spelling/firm details beyond the name given in the record as "Felt Martin PC." No district-court filing date or next procedural deadline is recorded in the provided segments.

The meeting moved next to a 'Citizens request' item and then to 'good of the order' with brief closing remarks; no substantive public comments on the appeal are captured in the supplied segments. The commission indicated that members and the public should direct questions about the executive session or the appeal to Holly or to the staff member who issued the confidentiality reminder.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee