Judge Tammy Long Hayward opened Clayton County State Court’s Courtroom 304 on June 2, 2026, and moved through a full arraignment calendar before calling the jail calendar, resolving dozens of matters ranging from traffic offenses to domestic battery and airport‑area incidents.
The judge and prosecutors announced pleas and negotiated dispositions in multiple cases. The state agreed to dismiss or nol pros several counts in arraignment matters — for example, the state dismissed one count and offered a $100 fine on a traffic charge for Tiffany Ansley; Judge Hayward accepted her NOLO plea and allowed 30 days to pay the total $153 owed, with payment instructions to be emailed.
Several defendants accepted negotiated pleas involving probation and special conditions. Trevor W. Tilman entered a plea under Georgia’s First Offender statute to simple battery (family violence); Judge Hayward imposed 12 months probation, required completion of a family violence intervention program, a parenting class and a $300 fine (suspended on completion). The court also discussed sealing the first‑offender record once probationary requirements are satisfied.
The court handled a string of jail‑calendar pleas and petitions. Probation officers recommended and the judge accepted a 30‑day revocation (credit for time served) for Venolin Lynn Banks after probation reported missed check‑ins and incomplete community service; the judge closed that petition after ordering the 30‑day sanction. Other negotiated pleas included a mix of short service sentences, suspended balances and special conditions such as anti‑theft courses, anger‑management classes and no‑contact orders. Several cases tied to airport locations or transit stations resulted in short terms and conditions barring return to the incident location.
Throughout the calendar Judge Hayward repeatedly emphasized compliance with probation conditions, the consequences of repeated driving on a suspended license (escalating fines and possible felony exposure), and available community resources, including housing and grief/substance‑use supports. She also reminded Zoom participants to display their full names and that only the court reporter’s transcript is the official transcript for court use.
The court instructed defendants who accepted probation terms to deliver documentation of any program completion (for example, anger‑management or treatment coursework) to probation so that reporting requirements and potential early termination of probation could be processed. The court set several follow‑up dates and ordered the jail to contact specified family members in at least one release instruction.
The docket moved efficiently with the court accepting both guilty/no‑contest pleas and nolo pleas, entering terms tailored to individual cases — from fines and short jail time to longer probationary supervision with treatment and community service requirements. Several defendants were released with instructions to follow up with probation staff, while others were returned to custody pending service of short terms.