The Finance Committee voted unanimously to transfer oversight of the assessor department from the community development director to the finance director.
A staff presenter told the committee the assessor function had been handled in-house historically but has operated under a contracted service in recent years. Staff said operational oversight had effectively shifted toward finance functions — particularly because the finance director also serves as treasurer and regularly interacts with the assessor — and that moving formal supervision to finance aligns with the municipal code.
Committee members had no substantive questions and the presiding official called for a motion. The committee moved, seconded and approved the transfer by voice vote; the record shows the motion passed unanimously. The transcript does not record the names of the mover or seconder or individual roll-call votes.
Why it matters: shifting formal supervision affects where responsibility and oversight for the assessor’s contract and related processes will sit inside city government. Staff said the change reflects how work has been handled operationally since before 2016 and will centralize oversight with the department that manages fiscal controls.
What happened next: the committee accepted the item and moved on to other business; staff did not provide an implementation timeline for administrative reassignment in the recorded excerpts.
Provenance: The assessor-supervision presentation and the motion appear in the meeting transcript beginning with the discussion of item 26051 and concluding with the committee vote recorded in the same agenda segment.