Cayce council delays decision on proposed Thomas Dambo troll sculpture after divided public comment

The Cayce City Council on April 22 deferred a final decision on a proposed Thomas Dambo troll sculpture after residents and tourism officials split over the project's costs, transparency and potential economic benefit. Council Member Tiffany Aull moved to continue the matter and organize a public presentation with contract details on Monday, April 27 at 5:30 p.m.; Council Member Alice Rose seconded and the motion passed 3–2.

During the meeting’s public comment period seven speakers addressed Item 9A. Opponents said the city has more pressing needs. Robin Reese told the council the city should prioritize "public safety, parks, and infrastructure improvements" before a large-scale art installation. Ron Wright objected to the item’s prior discussion in executive session and asked for greater transparency about costs and site selection.

Supporters and tourism officials urged councilors to consider potential visitation and media attention. Joe Long described the proposal as a "world-class public art installation" and argued it could be a strategic tourism investment. Vickie Davis, executive director of the Capital City/Lake Murray Country Regional Tourism Board, said comparable Thomas Dambo installations have attracted "tens of thousands of visitors" and offered to assist with regional marketing.

Council discussion after executive session focused on the need for more detailed project planning, including feasibility studies, site selection, security, maintenance, construction oversight, liability and a clear accounting of how hospitality/accommodations tax or private funds would be used. Assistant City Manager/Utilities Director Betsy Catchings and City Attorney James Smith were present during the executive session that reviewed negotiation points with the artist; Mayor Partin later stated no formal action was taken while in executive session.

The council’s decision on April 22 was limited to advancing public engagement and releasing contract details for review; no contractual agreement with the artist was approved that night. The item will return for council consideration after the April 27 public presentation.