Councilmember Rosenau led a review of a three‑tier Planning Commission work plan, explaining commissioners had voted to pursue a narrow 'Option 1' cleanup as a practical first step but left Options 2 and 3 available for broader affordability work.
"Their final vote represented, let's do option one," Director Hoffman said, noting that choosing Option 1 does not preclude moving to Options 2 or 3 later if advantages appear. Rosenau and several councilmembers stressed that building costs and land prices are major affordability constraints and that increased unit counts alone may not reduce prices without incentives or scale.
Councilmembers debated tradeoffs between neighborhood character and affordability. Some urged what one councilmember called a 'go big' approach — a larger, more intensive effort to affect affordability — while others recommended targeting changes to specific zones or using design rules (for example, limiting facade door counts) to maintain neighborhood scale.
To help the Planning Commission focus, the Council agreed to form a Planning Commission Work Plan subcommittee (Councilmembers Rosenau, Riddle and Vice Chair Goldman) to review the Leland middle‑housing report, identify 6–8 priority items, and present recommended priorities at the next Committee of the Whole.
Director Hoffman said the Commission had chosen Option 1 to gain traction this year but would be receptive to Council direction on specific items to explore under Options 2 or 3.
Next steps: the Council subcommittee will vet the work plan and report back to guide the Commission’s agenda.