A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Multiple no-contest pleas in parking-lot assault cases; court imposes suspended jail terms and restitution

May 28, 2026 | Judge David D. Wolfe State of Tennessee, Judicial, Tennessee


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Multiple no-contest pleas in parking-lot assault cases; court imposes suspended jail terms and restitution
Several defendants connected to a June 3, 2023 confrontation in a parking lot adjacent to the Perfect Pig restaurant entered no-contest pleas in Dickson County Circuit Court; the judge accepted the factual proffers and imposed suspended jail terms, probation and restitution.

The court described the incident as involving a financial dispute between the Davenports and a victim identified as Joe Townsend. Prosecutors said a partial video shows a member of the Davenport household with a metal bat and that Townsend sought treatment at Horizon ER with facial injuries. The state proffered those facts while the court completed plea colloquies with the defendants.

Ted Bradley Elliott Davenport pleaded no contest to simple assault; the court found him guilty on the charge and sentenced him to 11 months and 29 days in county jail suspended to probation, ordering joint restitution of $1,000 with co-defendant Erica Davenport. The aggravated-robbery count was dismissed under the plea agreement.

The court also accepted a no-contest plea from Erica (recorded in the transcript as Erica Davenport) to an amended simple-assault count and sentenced her to 11 months and 29 days suspended to supervised probation with $1,000 restitution (jointly with Davenport) and court costs; another co-defendant’s plea to an amended count received the same suspended sentence and restitution terms.

The judge reminded the parties that the pleas do not admit wrongdoing but enable the court to rely on the state's evidence for sentencing. The court directed the defendants to see the probation department and closed those dockets.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee