High‑school coach presents interest survey and funding plan for girls flag football; board to study Title N and costs

A Manhattan High School physical education teacher urged the board to consider adding a girls flag‑football program next fall, saying a district poll drew 57 responses and that roughly 20–30 students would likely participate. “Fifty‑three percent said they would definitely do it,” the teacher said, describing the survey and local interest.

The presenter said several nearby districts — Three Forks, Jefferson, Belgrade, Bozeman and Gallatin — have approved similar programs, and noted an Atlanta Falcons program currently offers a one‑time $10,000 grant to Montana schools while flag football remains non‑MHSA (not sanctioned). “There’s minimal equipment needs and transportation will be the main ongoing cost,” the presenter said, adding that when the sport becomes sanctioned the external grant may no longer apply and the district would then be responsible for full funding.

Trustees focused on compliance and sustainability. Several asked whether the program would pull athletes from volleyball and whether Title N proportionality rules would require adding a boys sport if female participation increases. Administration answered that participation numbers would determine Title N implications and that the district would need to analyze participation data before committing resources. One trustee said the district should compare current year participation figures to project any Title N effects.

The board did not vote on the proposal. Trustees agreed to form a small fact‑finding group involving a trustee, district administrators (including the athletic director) and a booster‑club representative to clarify projected roster sizes, transportation and recurring costs, grant timing, and Title N compliance. The presenter requested that any board action be considered by the July meeting so the district could contact program funders and have logistics in place for next fall.

Next steps: the board asked administration to collect hard participation numbers, draft a budget estimate (including transportation), and return with recommendations in time for the July meeting. The board emphasized it will not approve the program until Title N equity implications and sustainable funding are clear.