Alexander "Xander" Atwood, a resident of 200 West Pleasant Street, told the Angola City Council on May 18 that the city should restore municipal pickup of grass clippings and include the service in utility billing or an optional monthly fee.
Atwood said he and his family moved to Angola in 2024 and that current options for disposing of clippings — driving them to the regional drop-off operated by the Northeast Indiana Solid Waste Management District or using grass cycling — are impractical for his household because of time, vehicle condition and cost. He argued grass clippings make up a large share of yard waste nationally and that leaving clippings on lawns can look "tacky" and, in dry spells, fail to decompose sufficiently to be useful as mulch.
The resident proposed a utility-funded service or an optional fee of $6–$10 per month per household to pay for twice-monthly pickup, citing practices in nearby cities such as South Bend, Fort Wayne, Kokomo and Anderson as models. He asked the council to consider the proposal as part of broader efforts to support downtown revitalization and keep neighborhood yards well maintained.
Council members thanked Atwood for his presentation but described practical obstacles. The mayor said the city has tried grass pickup in the past and ran into operational problems, including machinery breakdowns and issues with a community composting drop-off. The mayor emphasized limited time, manpower and financial resources and said the city concentrates its yard-waste program on brush and leaves because of those constraints.
Chad Ritter, identified by the mayor as the street superintendent, gave operational detail: adding grass pickup would require dedicated crews and equipment time, conflict with current programs such as road repairs and crack sealing, increase wear on specialized machinery (including additional tire usage) and raise maintenance costs. Ritter said leaf machines and associated equipment are expensive and are damaged when used for mixed loads.
Several council members expressed sympathy for Atwood but warned that an added monthly charge — one council member estimated constituents would resist a $5–$15 increase — would likely prompt strong pushback from residents concerned about taxes or assessments. One member referenced recent property tax appeals in the constituency as evidence of sensitivity to added costs.
The council did not vote on any change to policy during the meeting. Members said they would reflect on the feasibility of Atwood’s suggestion, including the possibility of an optional or seasonal fee, but provided no timetable or commitment for action.
The public comment and council response concluded with thanks to Atwood and a promise to review city services and potential improvements.