A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Walton County staff, SwiftGV kick off land development code workshops to streamline permitting

May 18, 2026 | Walton County, Florida


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Walton County staff, SwiftGV kick off land development code workshops to streamline permitting
Commissioner Curry opened the session by urging “thoughtful planning and responsible development” that is consistent and transparent, saying Walton County will aim for clarity and predictability as it updates its land development code.

Deputy Director Kelly Schultz and the county's planning team then walked attendees through the BPR packet and a live audience survey used to shape the rewrite. Schultz described the basic one-page application, a notarized compliance affidavit that applicants must sign, and a sequence in which planning reviews setbacks and environmental constraints before the building department issues construction permits.

“Once the BPR is approved, then that goes to the building department for your actual construction permit,” Schultz said, summarizing the two-step process applicants should expect. She also stressed that combined-lot approvals require recording documents with the clerk of court before staff will finalize a permit.

Staff reviewed forms tied to stormwater (master-stormwater compliance letters and three-BMP options for smaller lots), floodplain certifications, and environmental affidavits for turtle lighting, beach mice and White Sands protections. Schultz said many of those requirements apply primarily to properties south of Choctawhatchee Bay.

Schultz also explained a recently changed accessory dwelling unit (ADU) affidavit: Walton County allows an ADU up to 800 square feet (or 75% of the primary dwelling for smaller homes) and the updated form removes a prior restriction that barred ADUs from short-term rentals.

Throughout the session staff flagged common plan-review deficiencies—missing finished-floor elevation, incomplete stormwater grading, parking dimensions, and incorrect legal descriptions—that routinely delay approvals and asked applicants to submit complete packages to avoid resubmittals.

The county closed the recorded portion by urging residents and developers to use pre-application meetings for complex projects and to send follow-up questions to the county planning email so staff can address specific cases after the workshop.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee