Co Chair Foster presided over House Finance as members finalized amendment work on SB 140, the Fire Station Grant Program, and voted down two proposed changes intended to increase state support for small off‑road communities.
Representative Jimmy moved Amendment 3, which he said would lower local matching requirements to make the grant program accessible for villages and communities off the road system. Keenan Miller, staff to Representative Jimmy, summarized the amendment as aligning with a prior change that reframed language from a department cap to a community contribution floor: “a community with a population of less than 500 off of the road system must pay at least 25% of the cost of a project,” with higher floors for larger communities.
Committee members disagreed over the amendment’s likely effects. Supporters argued the change would help villages that cannot bond or raise local taxes, while opponents said it would redesign the program and risk absorbing funds into small projects at the expense of larger station renovations. Representative Galvin said the measure resonated with rural needs and gave examples of communities that have struggled for equipment and replacement of aged firefighting materials.
After debate and a recorded roll call, the committee voted 4–7 against Amendment 3. Representative Jimmy then moved Amendment 4 to allow funding for major firefighting equipment in communities without stations. The bill sponsor’s staff said Amendment 4 broadened the bill beyond its original intent; Representative Stout and others opposed on similar grounds. Amendment 4 also failed on a roll call.
With the contested amendments rejected, Representative Schrage moved SB 140 out of committee as amended (reflecting prior adoption of Amendment 2 and other conforming changes). Representative Vano withdrew an objection, and the committee approved the motion, moving SB 140 out of House Finance with individual recommendations and an attached fiscal note. The committee authorized legislative legal to make technical and conforming changes.
The committee’s action preserves the core structure of the fire station grant program while keeping intact the scoring and prioritization language some members said is important to preserve, and leaves open future work on how best to target small‑community needs.