Rules Committee pulls SCR 84 from consent, approves remainder of consent agenda and passes SCR 84
May 18, 2026 | California State Assembly, House, Legislative, California
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The California State Assembly Rules Committee convened and completed a roll call before taking action on the consent agenda and on SCR 84.
The Chair opened the meeting and asked the Secretary to call the roll. The Secretary moved that item 9 be removed from the consent calendar to be voted on separately. The committee then held a roll-call vote on the remainder of the consent agenda; the transcript records affirmative responses from members identified as Pacheco, Lackey, Laquie, Ta, Garcia, Gonzales, Irwin, Rodriguez, Sanchez and Zuber, after which the Chair stated the motion passes.
The Chair then asked for a motion on item number 9, identified in the record as SCR 84; a second was noted. The Secretary called the roll for SCR 84. The roll-call entries recorded in the transcript are: Pacheco — aye; Lackey — not voting; Arons/Ta — not voting; Garcia — aye; Gonzales — aye; Irwin — aye; Rodriguez — aye; Sanchez — not voting; Ziburr — aye. Based on those roll-call entries the Chair announced that the motion passes. The transcript does not include the text or subject matter of SCR 84.
No speakers in the transcript gave substantive remarks about the content of SCR 84 or any of the consent items; actions recorded in the meeting were procedural votes and motions as described. After the vote on SCR 84 the Chair adjourned the Rules Committee.
Votes at a glance: the remainder of the consent agenda was approved by recorded aye responses from the members listed above; SCR 84 was recorded as passing on a roll-call where several members were recorded as "not voting."
The Chair opened the meeting and asked the Secretary to call the roll. The Secretary moved that item 9 be removed from the consent calendar to be voted on separately. The committee then held a roll-call vote on the remainder of the consent agenda; the transcript records affirmative responses from members identified as Pacheco, Lackey, Laquie, Ta, Garcia, Gonzales, Irwin, Rodriguez, Sanchez and Zuber, after which the Chair stated the motion passes.
The Chair then asked for a motion on item number 9, identified in the record as SCR 84; a second was noted. The Secretary called the roll for SCR 84. The roll-call entries recorded in the transcript are: Pacheco — aye; Lackey — not voting; Arons/Ta — not voting; Garcia — aye; Gonzales — aye; Irwin — aye; Rodriguez — aye; Sanchez — not voting; Ziburr — aye. Based on those roll-call entries the Chair announced that the motion passes. The transcript does not include the text or subject matter of SCR 84.
No speakers in the transcript gave substantive remarks about the content of SCR 84 or any of the consent items; actions recorded in the meeting were procedural votes and motions as described. After the vote on SCR 84 the Chair adjourned the Rules Committee.
Votes at a glance: the remainder of the consent agenda was approved by recorded aye responses from the members listed above; SCR 84 was recorded as passing on a roll-call where several members were recorded as "not voting."
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
