Senate passes ban on warrant-resolution clinics after heated debate

Senator Bussello (Polk) called up House File 2787 and described the measure as a ban on warrant-resolution clinics—events organized to allow people with warrants to resolve them without immediate arrest. The sponsor said the bill would bar public funds and facilities for such clinics and impose fines or misdemeanors on officials who facilitate them using public resources.

Senator Buscayano (Polk) opposed an across-the-board ban and urged caution. He acknowledged a recent, tragic murder involving an individual who had been to a warrant clinic but warned the legislature against "throwing the baby out with the bathwater," noting Polk County has roughly 9,000 people with warrants and about 2,800 involve simple misdemeanors; he argued local governments should be allowed to incubate ideas to resolve warrants and reduce jail days and property-tax burdens.

Senator Hardman (Polk) also opposed an immediate ban and suggested a study or temporary moratorium to improve clinic design rather than prohibiting them outright. In closing remarks, Senator Bussello and other supporters, including Senator Buslow (closing speaker), said the experiment had failed and that public safety concerns warranted the state's response. Senator Buslow said, "It is undeniable that there was 1 warrant clinic held and afterwards, 1 murder," and characterized jail as a tool that provides community protection.

The sponsor moved final passage. The secretary read the bill for final passage; the roll call recorded 31 ayes and 12 nays and the bill passed the Senate. The floor record shows no further amendments; debate reflected a split between officials arguing clinics help reduce jail days and those who said a tragic outcome justifies prohibition.