A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Commissioners press for clearer standards as state outlines data-center advisory plans

May 14, 2026 | Berkeley County, West Virginia


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commissioners press for clearer standards as state outlines data-center advisory plans
Berkeley County commissioners said on May 14 they want stronger, clearer public standards after the state began outlining how proposed data centers would be evaluated and sited.

Commissioner Hardy, reporting on a Chamber of Commerce forum, said the state’s liaison for data centers, identified in the meeting as Mr. Morris, described plans to develop "a set of minimum standards" and to establish "an advisory board" to guide siting and community engagement. Developers from Penzance provided a map of properties in the Bennington-area site, Hardy said, and shared technical details about power and cooling that county officials had not previously received.

Why it matters: Data centers can bring tax revenue and jobs but also large demands on land, water and power. Commissioners said early public information gaps had created speculation and concern among residents; they sought a transparent process for standards and community input.

Hardy said the Bennington area was attractive to developers because of a nearby large substation offering substantial transmission capacity, and he relayed that the project team discussed cooling options that could rely heavily on effluent from a local wastewater treatment plant. "They said that may take care as much of 80% as of the cooling," Hardy told the commission, underscoring the technical trade-offs under consideration.

Hardy and colleagues also said the developer presented maps of properties that could be affected and that some landowners were willing to work with the developer. Commissioners urged state officials to provide more public detail and to proceed with a defined community‑engagement plan and advisory board that includes diverse local perspectives.

No formal decision was required at the meeting; commissioners said they will continue engagement with the state liaison and the developer and may call for additional briefings or public information sessions.

Next step: Commissioners said they will seek more data from the state liaison and developer and that county staff will share any new information with constituents when available.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee