A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Commission recommends code changes to define 'footprint' and clarify ADU size limit

May 14, 2026 | San Miguel County, Colorado


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission recommends code changes to define 'footprint' and clarify ADU size limit
The Planning Commission recommended that the Board of County Commissioners adopt a set of housekeeping amendments to the San Miguel County land‑use code that add a definition for the term "footprint" and clarify that accessory dwelling units (ADUs) are limited to a maximum floor area of 800 square feet.

Staff explained that 'footprint' will mean the portion of a building that covers the ground measured from the outside of exterior walls or columns, and that it includes roofed open areas but excludes roof overhangs up to 2 feet and open decks. The ADU change replaces an earlier unclear reference to a maximum "size" of 800 square feet with an explicit limit on floor area, which can be spread across multiple stories.

The change is presented as consistency and housekeeping to match past interpretation and recent floor‑area definition edits; staff said the amendment was drafted to conform with other code sections and was noticed in the Telluride Times.

Public commenter Nick Farko urged caution with the 2‑foot eave exclusion: "the 2 foot eave definition that's in there might be restrictive for somebody that's looking to do passive solar," he said, recommending a larger allowance for certain energy‑efficient designs.

Commissioners discussed the policy context—keeping ADUs smaller in denser zones to preserve neighborhood character while recognizing separate caretaker/caretaker‑unit rules in other zone districts—and agreed the staff‑proposed language aligned with historic practice. A motion to recommend the amendments to the BOCC passed; staff will clarify definition wording as part of the recommendation packet.

The commission moved the package forward as a recommendation; final adoption and any drafting clarifications are reserved for the Board of County Commissioners.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee