District administration presented a draft plan to integrate a one-year expiring AST (administrative/support) agreement into the general employee handbook for 2026–27, and outlined options for surrendering, aligning, or grandfathering legacy benefits.
Tanya (administration) said the work began with a board directive to combine the expiring AST handbook and to separate technical employees out of the AST group. Administration s recommendations include aligning vacation accruals, surrendering the AST-only $4,500 professional development stipend, aligning holiday and personal leave language, and standardizing workers-compensation/personal-injury language across staff. Tanya said 69 individuals used the professional development stipend last year, for a total of $109,500, and that surrendering it is largely cost neutral if redistributed across handbook changes.
On grandfathering, staff offered two choices: Option A (phase-out via attrition; current ASTs retain benefits until they sunset on June 30, 2026) and Option B (grandfather benefits for employees hired on or before June 30, 2026). For the sick-leave payout specifically, staff said one alignment option could negatively affect about 81 individuals who would otherwise qualify under legacy rules.
Board members asked for cost histories and the 10-year impact of sick-payouts; staff said HR can provide annual payout data and gave a quick figure that last-year sick payouts amounted to roughly $164,000 with a $50,000 budget line. Some members raised governance and trust concerns and requested legal counsel to weigh in on potential liabilities; staff recommended discussing legal exposure in closed session if necessary.
Why it matters: the changes affect compensation and retirement-related payouts for employees currently in the AST group and the board s governance of legacy agreements. Surrender or grandfathering choices will determine who keeps higher legacy benefits and how quickly those differences disappear through attrition.
Next steps: staff will bring final recommendations and estimated fiscal impacts to upcoming meetings (handbook discussion scheduled for June 23) and provide the detailed HR cost history requested by board members.