A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Members approve version 3.3 after clarifying hospital-budget language

May 08, 2026 | Health Care, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Committees, Legislative , Vermont


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Members approve version 3.3 after clarifying hospital-budget language
Members approved “version 3.3” in a roll-call vote after the chair clarified that the language was not intended to alter hospital budget orders.

"I want to be very clear. We heard a concern with some people that were reading the language that there might have been confusion about the 3.5 in addition to the hospital budget orders, but that is not the intent or the language," the chair said, adding that the measure should be treated as in addition to budget orders when establishing fiscal year 2027 budgets.

A committee member then moved, "I move we move 190 John 3.3." The clerk called the roll and recorded the following responses: Quit — yes; Alan — yes; Goldman — yes; Lauren — yes; Aaron Leers — yes; Powers — yes; Dave — yes; Taylor — no; Rebecca — yes; Was a book — yes. The roll-call sequence in the transcript indicates nine recorded "yes" votes and one "no" vote; the clerk then announced "10" immediately after the roll call (the transcript contains an unclear following line). Based on the vote reading, the motion was approved.

After the vote, the member who moved the measure said, "I get to assign the reporter of the bill and I am assigning myself. I think this is a really important bill. It's very important. I think it's a really important bill and I did reference based pricing last year." That member also said item 197 would be tabled and returned to on Tuesday so the meeting would end on time.

The meeting concluded shortly afterward and members signed off.

Notes: the transcript contains a few unclear lines (for example, a garbled announcement of "1000" after the clerk's tally). Where names appear exactly as in the transcript they are used verbatim.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee