Residents press commissioners on police‑contract transparency, Brownfield plan and gun lockers during marathon public comment

A wave of public commenters used the Oakland County Board’s April 8 public‑comment period to press commissioners on three related concerns: transparency around police‑service contract rates used by contracting townships, the 28 North Sagenov Brownfield redevelopment plan in Pontiac, and county purchases that affect schools and civil liberties.

Police‑contract transparency: Several elected local officials — including Orient Township Supervisor Chris Barnett, trustees Jack Love and others — said they lacked the contract data and rate calculations needed to set local millage requests for law‑enforcement services. Speakers said the county had promised detailed documentation and actual cost breakdowns but had not delivered on the timetable in the contracts; they urged commissioners to release the materials so township boards can set accurate millage rates. Multiple township officials said missing information could swing millions of dollars in projected costs for small jurisdictions.

Brownfield hearing: The board opened a statutory public hearing on the 28 North Sagenov Brownfield Redevelopment Plan in Pontiac; speakers including Mike Flores urged commissioners to ensure the redevelopment benefits downtown Pontiac, protect safety and neighborhood needs and coordinate with the city’s ongoing downtown transition.

Gun lockers and school safety: Dozens of speakers opposed the agenda item authorizing the purchase of gun lockers for school resource officers, arguing that evidence does not show such lockers reduce shooting deaths and that schools should invest in upstream prevention, mental‑health services and threat‑assessment teams. Advocates for survivors and gun‑violence prevention cited peer‑reviewed research showing higher casualty rates where armed officers were present in schools.

Why it mattered: Township leaders said lack of timely contract data threatens fiscal planning and the integrity of local millage votes. Residents and advocacy groups framed surveillance and in‑school armament as policy choices that carry civil‑liberties consequences and asked the county to redirect resources to housing, legal aid and community supports.

Next steps: Speakers demanded codified policy restricting ICE access to county property without a judicial warrant, additional funding for legal aid and food assistance, and clearer, documented accounting for police‑contract rates. Commissioners took no immediate separate vote to release new contract data during the meeting; the public pushed for follow‑up and for the board to consider revisiting its surveillance decision.