A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

LDCFM proposes six-factor formula to split shared operating costs between Lawrence and Douglas County

May 06, 2026 | Douglas County, Kansas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

LDCFM proposes six-factor formula to split shared operating costs between Lawrence and Douglas County
Representatives of Lawrence-Douglas County Fire Medical presented a proposed new approach May 6 for allocating the joint service27s shared operating costs between the City of Lawrence and Douglas County.

Chief Darling and LDCFM governance staff outlined weaknesses of the prior single-factor method (a staffing-based split) that produced volatile year-to-year swings when staffing assignments changed. To reduce abrupt shifts and better reflect service demand, the governance team proposed an unweighted composite of six objective factors: total population, total population protected, apparatus responses (counting each deployed apparatus), a fire/EMS staffing ratio, incidents by planning zone, and a modeled split that estimates how responses would have been allocated had the agencies remained separate. Applying 2020 census and recent 2024202025 call data produced a composite result of roughly 60.6% city / 39.4% county for shared operating expenses.

Staff said the formula is intended to be robust against small year-to-year changes, to provide clearer multi-year budgeting for both partners and to allow more targeted conversations about where to deploy resources without triggering large fiscal swings. Governance recommended a multi-year contract for the allocation (staff suggested three years to allow adjustments once Station 6 opens and to gather further data).

Commissioners questioned whether capital purchases (ambulances, fire apparatus) would remain the separate responsibility of the agency that historically purchased them; presenters said capital was envisioned to remain outside the shared operating bucket with the existing practice continuing unless changed by agreement. Public commenters including a former chief praised the analytic approach and urged archiving the derivation for future transparency.

The governance team will bring a formal recommendation and proposed multi-year agreement back to the board for approval; staff recommended using the composite percentages to build the 2027 budget pending a formal governance contract.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee