A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee hears bill to allow customer batteries to earn net‑metering credits

April 03, 2026 | Energy and Natural Resources, Senate , Committees , Legislative, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee hears bill to allow customer batteries to earn net‑metering credits
Representative Michael Vos introduced House Bill 1718, which would authorize customer generators who pair on‑site energy storage with their generation systems to collect net‑metering credits when they export stored electricity to the grid. "That's the plain and simple fact of the bill," Vos told the committee, framing the measure as a technical clarification to reflect how batteries are already used with solar and other distributed generation.

Supporters from the clean‑energy community told the committee the bill keeps statutes aligned with current practice and opens the door to programs that use batteries to reduce peak demand. Dina Dennis of the Community Power Coalition of New Hampshire said the bill "at its core [is] a practical clarification," noting it preserves the rule that batteries should generally be charged by on‑site generation while allowing exceptions for utility‑managed programs and storm‑hardening use cases.

Sam Evans Brown of Clean Energy New Hampshire described the measure as an initial, modest step: "So this is step one," he said, urging passage so the Public Utilities Commission can design tariffs and programs that maximize value to ratepayers. Witnesses pointed to an existing Liberty Utilities pilot that already allows paired batteries to export to the grid as an example of near‑term applications.

Department staff said the bill is neutral but flagged a technical drafting issue about which agency — the department or the commission — should implement particular subsections of RSA 374‑H. Josh Elliot, director in the Division of Policy and Programs, asked the committee to consider one targeted wording change replacing the word "commission" with "department" in a specific subsection to match statutory responsibilities.

Committee members asked clarifying questions about the bill's interaction with existing net‑metering principles and the PUC's authority. Proponents said the bill is intentionally non‑prescriptive: it enables storage to participate under net metering while leaving detailed program design and rates to the commission and department. The hearing closed without a recorded floor vote; sponsors said subsequent PUC rulemaking and tariff design would follow if the bill advances.

Next steps: the committee closed the hearing and left the bill available for further action at a later date.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee