A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Panel hears bill to let surviving family terminate a lease after a tenant's death

March 18, 2026 | 2026 Legislature MN, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Panel hears bill to let surviving family terminate a lease after a tenant's death
House File 3981, proposed to let surviving family members or designated representatives end a lease when a tenant dies, was presented to the Housing Finance & Policy Committee and laid over for further drafting.

Representative Lee described the bill as a pragmatic response to constituent experience in which families must continue paying rent for months after a tenant’s death. "This is a common-sense bill that would allow surviving family or other representatives of the deceased tenant to terminate a lease upon death," the representative said.

Maya Graham, a housing attorney at Home Line, testified in support and described the bill’s specific reforms: it would amend two statutes that currently permit tenants to end a lease only with two months’ notice—one for death and one for infirmity. The proposed changes would reduce notice periods, align the death statute with a 2020 amendment to the infirmity statute (so a single tenant’s death can trigger lease termination in certain circumstances), and require surviving co-tenants to agree to termination to prevent surprises for those remaining in the unit.

Cecil Smith of the Minnesota Multi Housing Association said housing providers appreciate the intent but warned the bill could create an operational imbalance: shorter notice windows for termination while providers’ obligations to make units available or pursue estate remedies would remain. Smith also raised concerns about the proposed penalty structure and asked the committee to resolve conflicts with existing statute language.

Committee members questioned retroactivity and were told the bill is not retroactive: leases signed prior to July 1, 2026 would remain under the existing statute. Members expressed broad sympathy for protecting surviving tenants and modernizing dated statutory language but also noted several drafting issues—including paragraph conflicts and the need to preserve operational predictability for housing providers—that require more work.

Next steps: House File 3981 was laid over so authors and stakeholders can resolve statutory conflicts and penalty language.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee