A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

State official says reverse-auction procurement for PBM showed no clear savings; bill would allow alternative processes

March 24, 2026 | 2026 Legislature MN, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

State official says reverse-auction procurement for PBM showed no clear savings; bill would allow alternative processes
Galen Bench, Enterprise Director for Employee Insurance, told the committee the original law required the state to procure pharmacy benefit management services through a reverse-auction with prescriptive technical parameters. He said the industry and procurement experience have changed in five years and that the Office of Legislative Evaluation reviewed the state's evaluation and affirmed there was no evidence of savings attributable to the reverse auction. "There's too much at stake to limit competition for the state's business in such an important area," Bench said, and the bill would allow Minnesota to use other procurement approaches if the evidence does not support a reverse auction. The file was laid over for possible inclusion.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee