A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

University of Hawaii asks state to fill possible federal shortfall for tumor registry

March 23, 2026 | Senate, Legislative , Hawaii


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

University of Hawaii asks state to fill possible federal shortfall for tumor registry
The University of Hawaii Cancer Center told the Senate Education Committee on March 23 that the Hawaii Tumor Registry — an NCI surveillance registry in operation since 1973 — faces potential federal funding cuts that could remove up to one‑third of current support. The registry’s principal investigator said the center seeks state funding to preserve personnel and replace discontinued pathology‑reporting software.

Brenda Hernandez described the registry’s work identifying cancer trends in Hawaii’s diverse populations and its role in cluster investigations and public health planning. ‘‘We are the only registry nationally to report cancer incidence, mortality and survival specifically among Native Hawaiians, Japanese, Chinese and Filipinos individually,’’ she said, urging state support to avoid a data gap that would hinder prevention and research.

Committee members pressed for fiscal detail and questioned how the cancer center prioritized projects after receiving state and institutional funds. Senators asked why the center could not reallocate internal resources and sought clarity on how cigarette‑tax and tuition special‑fund rules apply to registry support. Witnesses said their $1.5 million request would cover personnel, software replacement for electronic pathology reporting (a vendor relationship with Inspirata was discontinued), and related infrastructure.

The committee voted to pass HB 1970 with amendments that clarify the purpose of the requested funds, change the proposed means of financing to the tuition and special fees account, and send the bill to Ways and Means for further deliberation. Members signaled concern about competing priorities and the need to ensure sustained surveillance capacity if federal support declines.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee