Audit summary and revision notes

Audit results (selected categories):

- Spelling: []
- Clarity: []
- Chronology: []
- Framing: []
- Misinformation: [{"type":"numeric_transcription","description":"Contract increase described in transcript uses inconsistent phrasing 'from 3 million to 3 million 20,367.93' which is unclear.","severity":"medium"}]
- Misidentification: []
- Out_of_context: []
- Quantitative precision: [{"type":"amount_precision","description":"RFQ contract values and some contract increase amounts are not specified in the transcript; noted as 'not specified' or approximated.","severity":"medium"}]
- Process clarity: [{"type":"procurement_documentation_missing","description":"RFQ scoring tables and award amounts not included in record; jurors requested documentation.","severity":"medium"}]
- Context clarity: []
- Agency clarity: []
- Question emphasis: []
- Omission: [{"type":"missing_scoring_docs","description":"Transcript references scoring and a recommended firm but does not include scoring documentation; article notes that documentation was requested.","severity":"medium"}]
- Bias: []
- Duplicate: []

Revision actions taken:
1) Reworded the contract increase to avoid precise but potentially mistranscribed figure; report now uses 'approximately $3.02 million' and flags the transcript inconsistency in clarifying_details.
2) Where procurement values were not provided, articles state 'not specified' and record staff follow-up to provide documentation.
3) Ensured all quotes and attributions map to speakers listed in the transcript; used role labels where full names were not present.

No new facts were added beyond the meeting transcript.