A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee converts surveillance‑pricing bill into study after divided testimony

March 24, 2026 | Senate, Legislative , Hawaii


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee converts surveillance‑pricing bill into study after divided testimony
The Senate committee voted to convert House Bill 2458 HD3, a measure addressing surveillance‑driven price differentiation (sometimes called ‘‘surveillance pricing’’), into a study and asked the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (DCCA) and the Office of Consumer Protection (OCP) to examine enforcement needs and definitional clarity.

Supporters including the Hawaii Public Health Institute argued the practice allows companies to extract higher prices from people based on income, location or personal data and urged a prohibition for groceries and everyday essentials. DCCA enforcement staff and OCP said the agency would need technical expertise and appropriations to investigate algorithmic pricing and determine what data inputs are used to set prices. OCP Executive Director Mana Moriarty noted OCP shares concurrent jurisdiction with the Attorney General and has discussed enforcement approaches with that office.

Retailers including Safeway and the Retail Merchants of Hawaii urged the committee to hold the bill, citing vagueness in definitions and the removal of a loyalty‑program exemption from the HD3 draft. Retail witnesses warned the measure could unintentionally restrict routine discounting and loyalty programs that reduce prices for frequent shoppers.

The committee concluded that additional study is warranted. It changed HB2458 into a study request for DCCA and OCP, left appropriations blank for the initial study, and deferred the bill’s effective date to Jan. 1, 2077.

What happens next: DCCA and OCP were asked to examine definitions of surveillance pricing, enforcement mechanics (including whether technologists will be needed), and the potential treatment of loyalty programs before the Legislature moves forward.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee