Newport News council approves mini-storage at 200 Arthur Way over manager recommendation
March 27, 2024 | Newport News (Independent City), Virginia
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
On March 26, 2024, the Newport News City Council voted to adopt an ordinance granting a conditional use permit for a 6.14-acre site at 200 Arthur Way to BD Ash and Rice Mill LLC to operate an interior mini-storage facility.
Councilwoman Woodberry said she was "stunned" the project had been recommended for denial and described the parcel as long vacant and well sited for the proposed use. She said the project would "enrich the place" and could include a small medical use that would serve the neighborhood.
The city manager had recommended denial during the continued public hearing, citing reasons contained in the staff package (the recommendation was referenced in the hearing record). Two speakers, Alan Tanner and Colin Edwards, appeared for questions only; the applicant described protections built into the application to "protect downside" should surrounding retail fail, including extended leases and an intent to retain or backfill retail operators. Colin Edwards said he had extended leases "some extend to 2027 and beyond" and planned site improvements, EV charging stations and lighting to encourage retail activity.
Council debate focused on whether the proposal would stimulate economic activity and prevent further blight on a site residents said had been vacant for years. Councilman Harris asked for clarity on the applicant's approach if neighboring businesses failed; the applicant said the conditional use structure would allow some flexibility while leases and improvements were intended to sustain retail.
A roll-call vote recorded Councilwoman Woodberry, Vice Mayor Bethany, Councilman Harris, Mayor Jones and Councilwoman Vick voting in favor and Councilman Long voting no; the ordinance passed 5-1. The decision implements Conditional Use Permit D-223/D-0011 as presented in the council packet.
Next steps: the ordinance was adopted on first reading as contained in the packet and the conditions listed there will guide permitting and site development. The council did not direct additional study on this item during the meeting.
Councilwoman Woodberry said she was "stunned" the project had been recommended for denial and described the parcel as long vacant and well sited for the proposed use. She said the project would "enrich the place" and could include a small medical use that would serve the neighborhood.
The city manager had recommended denial during the continued public hearing, citing reasons contained in the staff package (the recommendation was referenced in the hearing record). Two speakers, Alan Tanner and Colin Edwards, appeared for questions only; the applicant described protections built into the application to "protect downside" should surrounding retail fail, including extended leases and an intent to retain or backfill retail operators. Colin Edwards said he had extended leases "some extend to 2027 and beyond" and planned site improvements, EV charging stations and lighting to encourage retail activity.
Council debate focused on whether the proposal would stimulate economic activity and prevent further blight on a site residents said had been vacant for years. Councilman Harris asked for clarity on the applicant's approach if neighboring businesses failed; the applicant said the conditional use structure would allow some flexibility while leases and improvements were intended to sustain retail.
A roll-call vote recorded Councilwoman Woodberry, Vice Mayor Bethany, Councilman Harris, Mayor Jones and Councilwoman Vick voting in favor and Councilman Long voting no; the ordinance passed 5-1. The decision implements Conditional Use Permit D-223/D-0011 as presented in the council packet.
Next steps: the ordinance was adopted on first reading as contained in the packet and the conditions listed there will guide permitting and site development. The council did not direct additional study on this item during the meeting.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
