Board formalizes superintendent evaluation, accepts donations and directs administration to consider reductions amid enrollment changes

At its Feb. 23 meeting, the Tri‑City United School Board passed a package of governance and fiscal items including a resolution to require an annual written evaluation of the superintendent and a direction to administration to examine program or staffing reductions for the 2026–27 school year.

Chris Velasax introduced the superintendent‑evaluation resolution, saying the measure is intended to “hold the board accountable to do that eval every year.” The resolution requires the board to evaluate the superintendent in writing at least once a year, adopt an evaluation format, provide a copy to the superintendent and allow the superintendent to submit a written response. The board approved the resolution by roll call; recorded affirmative votes were cast by Hillary, Marcia, Chris Velasc, Susie Rip and Cindy.

The board also accepted several small donations designated for elementary programs and extracurriculars and approved a consent agenda that included personnel actions (multiple hires and separations, temporary assignments) and bills totaling $4,579,733.58. The consent agenda passed by motion earlier in the meeting.

In a separate resolution prompted by declining enrollment and funding concerns, the board directed the superintendent and administration to consider reductions and discontinuances of programs or positions “to accomplish economies in the school district” and to return recommendations to the board. The motion was seconded and approved by roll call with the same affirmative members recorded.

Administrators reported enrollment is down by 10 compared with prior counts but has recovered by four recently, with most changes at the high‑school level and some families choosing online options. Finance committee members told the board the district audit is being finalized and a revised budget will be presented in March, and they flagged upcoming contract renewals for food service and transportation as items that will affect budgeting.

The board’s actions on evaluation and direction to study reductions set governance and budget priorities for the coming months; administrators said they will return with specific recommendations and budget adjustments for the board’s consideration.