Article 12 asked voters to fund three school capital projects: $365,000 for classroom presentation systems (to complete installations across classrooms), $1,400,000 for a holistic security systems upgrade (cameras, access control, visitor screening, radios and backend interconnectivity across the four schools), and $810,000 to finish Finn School floor replacement to address moisture and mold.
Assistant Superintendent Keith LeVoy and Superintendent Greg Martino explained project scope and the rationale for treating the technology purchase as capital (long equipment life). They described the security project as a comprehensive plan to modernize cameras, unify access control, improve PA and radio systems, and provide central monitoring/visibility that would support emergency response and coordination with police and fire.
Public Q&A focused on three themes:
- Level of detail: Many voters asked for more specifics (camera counts, contract and maintenance costs, where money would be spent); officials explained that operational details can be sensitive for security reasons but provided broad categories (cameras, radios, access control, visitor screening, PA upgrades).
- Cost and procurement timing: Some residents urged staging or smaller annual investments; school officials said the work is an effort to move from piecemeal investments to a long‑term, industry‑standard solution and to obtain economies of scale.
- Interoperability and response time: Supporters including the Police Chief argued that centralized visibility and improved communications will materially aid responders and school staff in incidents; skeptics questioned the incremental benefit versus other uses of funds.
An amendment to strike the $1.4M security portion was proposed and discussed at length; proponents of the amendment said voters lacked enough non-sensitive detail, while opponents said the district and safety officials had evaluated needs and that delay risked leaving the schools under‑equipped. The amendment was defeated; the full Article 12 motion passed (Moderator declared 2/3 majority).
Next steps
School and town staff will proceed with procurement and contracting processes consistent with town purchasing rules and will brief the public on implementation steps as appropriate. The superintendent noted some technology equipment at Nieri School would be mobile pending any larger facility changes.