A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee hears testimony urging end to prior authorization for opioid-use-disorder medications

April 09, 2026 | 2026 Legislature MN, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee hears testimony urging end to prior authorization for opioid-use-disorder medications
A Minnesota Senate committee heard testimony April 9 supporting a bill to remove prior-authorization and step-therapy requirements for FDA-approved medications to treat opioid use disorder, with clinicians and people in recovery saying administrative delays can cost lives.

Sponsor remarks to the Senate Health and Human Services Finance and Policy Committee framed the measure as a public-health step to reduce barriers for evidence-based medications that lower overdose risk and stabilize patients. The sponsor said the bill applies to medical assistance (Medicaid) and aims to prevent administrative paperwork from delaying treatment.

Dr. Kirk (testifying for the record) said prior authorization commonly blocks access to long-acting injectable formulations and other treatments that clinicians judge to be best for their patients. “The window when someone is ready for treatment can be short,” he said, arguing that delays increase relapse and overdose risk and leave providers unable to deliver timely care.

Jason Adventure, who identified himself as an executive committee member with Impact Minnesota and the Minnesota Coalition for the Homeless, gave a personal account of being forced to wait for insurance authorization after asking for treatment. “I was forced to wait twice and one of those times I didn't make it — I overdosed,” he said, urging lawmakers to eliminate prior authorization for medications he said saved his life.

Kimberly Price, an RN at a public-health clinic, described hundreds of hours spent completing prior-authorizations that she said divert clinicians from direct patient care. “Insurers often make decisions without knowing our patients' histories,” she said, adding that most prior-authorization requests are ultimately approved but after dangerous delays.

Committee members expressed support for improving access but raised questions about fiscal notes and whether the proposal's costs fall only on medical-assistance or ripple into commercial markets. The sponsor clarified the bill would apply to Medical Assistance. The committee adopted an author's amendment offered at the hearing and laid the bill over for later consideration.

Next steps: the committee will await updated fiscal estimates and may incorporate the measure into budget negotiations. No final votes were taken at the April 9 meeting.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee