Finance Director Jonathan Flores told the council the city faces structural pressures and presented several revenue measures intended to stabilize operations and support public safety.
Key proposals: Jonathan raised the idea of levying a dedicated cemetery property tax outside the state’s 3.5% cap to replace roughly $96,000 in general‑fund support; he said that would add about 2¢ to the tax rate and cost the average homeowner roughly $2 a year. He also proposed a credit‑card convenience fee for utility payments (a 3% fee capped at $2 for utilities) that could recover roughly $96,000 of the city’s $130,000 in general‑fund card fees and almost all of the utility card fees (estimated $516,000). Another option discussed: exempting city facilities from utility charges (projected general‑fund impact ~$464,000 per year unless negotiated rates are used).
Ballot option: Jonathan outlined a route to place public‑safety expenditures before voters if the council wants to fund pensions, pay plans or capital items that exceed the 3.5% cap; that path would require accelerating the budget schedule to early August to meet ballot deadlines for November.
Budget pressures: He flagged a potentially large valuation loss from a new state exemption for business personal property that could reduce valuations by about $234 million and cost the city an estimated $1.8–1.9 million in property tax revenue in the coming cycle.
Representative quote: "If we were to do it at that $96,000, it would be about a 2‑cent increase to the tax rate," Jonathan said of a cemetery tax.
Why it matters: Jonathan framed these ideas as ways to create more stable revenue and to target increases for public‑safety needs; any of them would require legal review and council action and, in the case of a voter measure, accelerated schedule and public outreach.
Ending note: Council members asked staff for legal vetting and estimated household impacts; Jonathan and staff said they would return with more precise modeling and timelines.