At the Select Board meeting on May 28, members reviewed developments on Articles 10, 11 and a late amendment affecting the schools and discussed limited avenues to fund an unexpected budget increase.
Staff reported there were no new amendments to Articles 10, 11 or 19 and that the advisory committee had not changed its position. Board members noted a recent statewide pattern of late‑filed amendments that temporarily pass at town meeting and are later reconsidered, producing instability for municipal budgeting.
Members discussed funding options and agreed there was not a clear source in the operating budget that would sustainably cover a roughly $1 million late amendment for a school program. One member cautioned that consultant and professional services budgets are largely tapped out and that using reserves or one‑time funds would not create predictable, ongoing funding for programs such as an expanded world language offering. "Even at that $1 million mark there wasn't enough money to fund a program with the staffing that would be necessary to make it as robust and meaningful as the program review suggested," a board member said.
The board also debated Article 11 and a proposal to divide the CPA (Community Preservation Act) questions so town meeting could vote on items individually rather than as a single omnibus vote. Proponents said dividing the question would provide clearer feedback to the CPA committee and the public about which projects have strong support. The board put a motion for favorable action on dividing Article 11 to a voice vote and recorded the motion as carried; the transcript does not provide a complete named tally.
Board members emphasized that the School Committee retains authority over how school funds are allocated and that the select board cannot compel allocation to a specific program. Staff were directed to continue coordinating with committees and to report back if further budgetary information emerges.
The meeting then moved on to town meeting business.