Council voted 6–1 to waive privilege on a narrowly defined portion of city legal correspondence dated Feb. 17, 2026, that relates to the abortion‑zoning exemption discussion.
Councilmember (S3), who brought the resolution forward, said the purpose was transparency: “I ask we release it so the public can be aware,” S3 told the council during the item. Members debated a broader amendment to release a wider set of communications; that amendment was defeated 2–5. After the defeat of broader disclosure, the narrower motion — limited to the paragraph and timeframe specified in the resolution — passed 6–1.
The meeting transcript shows repeated concerns about overuse of attorney‑client privilege; advocates for disclosure said some communications labeled privileged were policy in nature and should be public. Opponents said privilege protects the city’s legal posture and cautioned against waiving it wholesale. The council’s approval applies only to the portion specified in the adopted resolution; staff indicated any further disclosures would follow legal and FOIA processes.