Residents press Lapeer commission to require appraisal, disclosure for Brookwood brownfield/TIF plan

During public comment at the March 2 Lapeer City Commission meeting, resident Wes Weber asked commissioners to scrutinize a proposed Brookwood development and the related brownfield/TIF financing, saying the 33.66‑acre parcel north of his property is listed in public materials for $3,579,986 — about $106,400 per acre — a figure he called ‘‘oddly specific’’ and far higher than typical residential land values in the area.

Weber’s request: He asked whether the planning commission or the brownfield authority will require an independent, third‑party appraisal of land value before the city approves any brownfield plan or TIF reimbursement package; asked how land acquisition costs will be treated in the financing‑gap analysis submitted to the state (MISTA cited in his remarks); and asked whether any related‑party transactions (developer/seller relationships) will be disclosed in the brownfield plan. He warned that inflated land costs could be factored into financing‑gap calculations and ultimately increase tax capture at the expense of local school taxes and other taxing jurisdictions.

Staff and commissioner response: Commissioners acknowledged the concern and said the planning commission and brownfield authority could review the questions, and staff said transparency and disclosure would be considered as the formal review proceeds. Commissioners encouraged Weber to ensure the concerns are forwarded to planning staff and the brownfield authority for review.

Why it matters: Brownfield plans and TIF reimbursements can shift future tax revenue to development costs rather than to general fund or school districts. Public scrutiny on valuation and disclosure helps ensure the city does not agree to reimbursements that exceed true land value or that obscure related‑party dealings.

Next steps: Commissioners said they would forward the concerns to planning staff and the appropriate authority for review; if the brownfield plan advances, the city should make clear how acquisition costs are treated in gap analyses and whether related‑party transactions are disclosed.