A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Two firms present strategic-planning approaches to Romulus Community Schools board

April 27, 2026 | Romulus Community Schools, School Boards, Michigan


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Two firms present strategic-planning approaches to Romulus Community Schools board
Representatives from two education consulting firms presented competing approaches to leading a strategic-planning process for Romulus Community Schools at the April 27 board meeting.

Great Schools Partnership’s Jose Bo, director of school partnerships, and Erica Walstrom, senior associate, described a four-stage process — laying the foundation, seeking community input, drafting the plan and implementing with monitoring — and emphasized defining educational equity as “ensuring just outcomes for each student, raising marginalized voices and challenging the imbalance of power and privilege,” Bo said. They proposed a core strategic-planning team of roughly 12–15 community members, supplemented by broad outreach (surveys and focus groups) and iterative drafts that are re-shared with the public. The presenters said they pair strategic plans with follow-up capacity-building so plans do not “sit on a wall.”

Hanover/Handover Research’s Jason Broken, senior director, and Cassie Cork, K‑12 research adviser, presented a mixed-methods model grounded in custom research and advisory services. Their team described deploying district-wide surveys, targeted focus groups, and quantitative analysis to set priorities and key performance indicators (KPIs), then supporting on-site workshops and dashboards to monitor progress. They said a typical engagement includes two to three on-site visits and ongoing virtual consultation tailored to a district’s scale and timeline.

Board members asked about logistics, travel and how each firm helps districts translate vision into measurable actions. Superintendent Ben Edmonson and trustees emphasized that the district wants a partner who will support implementation, not just produce a document. The board did not vote to select a vendor at the meeting; trustees said they will review materials and resume the procurement discussion in a subsequent meeting.

The presentations set out the main choices the district faces: prioritize deep, in‑person community engagement and capacity building or prioritize robust research and monitoring tools, or combine elements of both.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee