Council approves $299,797 study to assess moving Red Oak Victory; National Park Service reiterates interpretive preference to keep ship in place

The Richmond City Council voted to approve a roughly $299,800 feasibility and preliminary-design contract to investigate relocating the SS Red Oak Victory to a higher-visibility berth near Ford Point, while National Park Service (NPS) staff told the council the park's adopted general-management plan favors keeping the vessel in its current Shipyard No. 3 setting.

Study approved: Port staff asked the council to authorize a contract with Lift Consultants to produce a 15% design-level preliminary engineering package, a permitting-pathway analysis, and a cost estimate for a relocation and associated wharf work. The council approved the study, with Council Member Wilson recorded as the lone no vote.

NPS position and city authority: Acting superintendent Elaine Jackson Rando summarized the statutory relationship between the city and NPS: Congress created the Rosie the Riveter World War II Homefront National Historical Park as a partnership park and the NPS is authorized to provide interpretation and technical assistance, but it owns no land here and "NPS may not spend appropriated funds to operate, maintain or preserve the SS Red Oak Victory," she said. Isabelle Ziegler, NPS cultural resources lead, explained that the park's general-management plan retains the ship in its current basin because that location provides the authentic shipyard context.

Public comments and preservation arguments: Volunteers, crew and Red Oak leadership urged the study's approval, saying the ship's current berth limits visibility, access and earned revenue. Red Oak crew supplied operating figures used in the presentation (crew estimated roughly $150,000 in current-year revenue at Basin 5 versus projections of several hundred thousand to a million dollars if relocated and better integrated with Rosie the Riveter/Ford Point visitorship).

Costs, timing and funding questions: Staff and speakers acknowledged major infrastructure costs would be necessary to move and rehouse the vessel; earlier back-of-envelope figures mentioned in the meeting ranged from tens of millions for new wharf construction and associated work to the need for a multi-source fundraising strategy. Port staff stressed the study does not commit the port or city to pay relocation costs; the study will provide clearer cost and timeline estimates before fund-raising or formal commitments.

Vote and next steps: The council approved the Lift/Lift Consultants contract; staff will proceed with the feasibility and permitting analysis and return with findings and recommendations. National Park Service officials said they would continue to collaborate through the cooperative-agreement framework.

The action advances a study that volunteers say is needed to determine whether relocation would improve long-term sustainability for one of the last surviving Victory ships built in Richmond.