Board approves personnel reappointments as parents and union protest non‑renewals

The Edison Township Board of Education approved a motion to reappoint personnel during a meeting marked by sustained, emotional public comment about teacher non‑renewals and the district’s budget choices.

A roll call on the personnel reappointment motion produced a majority in favor. The vote record on the floor shows seven members voting yes and one member voting no; some board members noted they would recuse themselves from any specific conflict of interest if applicable.

Several parents and educators used the public comment period to describe immediate harms from the budget. Resident Matthew Pino said his wife, Gabriella Pino, received a non‑renewal notice while seven months pregnant and described the family’s financial and medical stress: “Receiving this news during teacher appreciation week and right before Mother’s Day is nothing short of a slap in the face to the educators and their families,” he said.

Matt Revnack, president of the Edison Teachers Association, said union members had been inundated since the prior Friday: “On Friday, 52 of my members, staff members were non‑renewed,” he said, describing calls from distraught employees and the broader human toll of the reductions. Revnack asked the board to consider rehiring priorities, guaranteed preschool placements for affected families and other mitigations.

Speakers urged practical steps: guaranteed preschool slots for displaced preschool‑age children, preferential rehiring outreach when vacancies arise during the year, and reallocation of capital reserves if the Talmage land purchase is canceled so funds could be used for urgent repairs and program restorations.

Board members repeatedly expressed gratitude for staff and said they were listening; some apologized publicly for prior remarks. Several told the audience they were relying on professional recommendations and the district’s administration to make complex decisions about staffing and budget priorities.

What’s next: The board approved the personnel list and closed public comment; multiple community members said they would pursue political and procedural remedies at future meetings and in elections if they do not receive additional transparency or changes.