The board approved the consent agenda items listed in the meeting packet (items C2 through C4), according to a speaker who stated the items were approved as outlined.
Later in the meeting, an administrator noted the packet recommended the board approve a contract with the law firm Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter; the transcript records the recommendation but does not show whether the board voted to approve the contract during the recorded segments. The administrator also read a recommendation that the board enter executive session "to consider the investigation of charges or complaints against a district employee or official pursuant to ORC 121.22(g)(1) and to consult with the board's attorney concerning disputes involving the public body that are the subject of pending court action," as read aloud in the meeting.
The packet-language said that any informal action taken in executive session would be followed by formal board action in open session if needed. The transcript records the recommendation to enter executive session but does not include a recorded vote or subsequent open-session board action on those items in the captured segments.
The board did not record further action on these recommendations within the provided transcript excerpts.