Exeter Township board hears tight budget outlook and takes straw poll supporting a 3.5% tax proposal

Business Administrator Brian Fe and board finance leaders presented a budget built around a set of assumptions: rising salaries and health‑insurance costs (including a one‑time network/ trust infusion), uncertain state and federal reimbursements, enrollment volatility and post‑capital maintenance reductions. Administration said those pressures make a tax increase likely and proposed a 3.5% district tax increase to present a balanced preliminary budget.

Administrators stressed uncertainties that affect final numbers: state budget timing and the school trust’s rate increase (a cited roughly 15–16% total health‑cost impact after a one‑time payment), variable employee insurance participation, and unpredictable enrollment “bubble” classes that can force midyear staffing changes. Brian Fe explained that changes in staffing also affect state retirement and Social Security reimbursement, which complicates revenue projections.

During public discussion, residents and some board members proposed alternatives to reduce pressure on property taxes: raising or restructuring activity/participation fees, charging for facility use, expanding booster or philanthropic support, and targeted fundraising or scholarship funds to preserve equity for low‑income students. Administration cautioned that higher fees can depress participation and that collection/waiver mechanics require new processes.

After discussion the board conducted a nonbinding straw poll on supporting the administration’s proposed 3.5% tax increase. The roll call for the straw poll was recorded as: Dr. Andrew Batler (yes); Deborah Bloom (yes); Joseph Cook (yes); John Fiddler (no); Dr. Anne Herring (yes); Jason Mill (yes); Julia Schaefer (yes). The tally on the straw poll was six yes, one no; two board members were absent or excused.

Administrators said the board must adopt a preliminary budget for public inspection on the statutory schedule and noted remaining budget decisions (meal pricing, contract renewals and potential fee policy changes) will be finalized at the May voting meeting. Several board members asked staff to examine fee‑structure options and to form a small committee to vet participation‑fee revisions and facility‑use charges for possible future implementation.